Entertainment is the process of getting joys,happiness,fun,etc. which makes people go wild.It helps to reduce stress,tension and helps to bring a new life in a person.entertainment itself sounds so wild full of fun,excitement and madness. Entertainment play a dynamic and vital role in or daily life and teaches us how to be happy and how to have a show your madness on your body cause entertainment never sleeps.
It is a known fact that there is a great proliferation of entertainment options. There are so many forms of entertainment targeted towards children for different purposes such as educational, informative, or pure entertainment purposes. For this reason, a lot of parents find it hard to censor what their wards view and are thus in a dilemma over making choices for program view. Despite this fact, parents should be responsible, and not necessarily the media, for ensuring that the children view appropriate content.
Firstly, parents are responsible for their children. The choices the children make are largely influenced by the parent’s views. As such, parents are in a solid position to ensure that at each time their children make a choice, those choices would be approved by the parent. The parent can thus note which entertainment content would be suitable for the child and which would not, thus shielding against wrong influences.
Secondly, the media industry is known as a for-profit organization, and its focus will be more on maximizing share-holders’ profits than on ensuring the suitability of programs being produced. For this reason, the media cannot be made fully responsible for ensuring standards as a lot of energy would be focused more on promoting the production than on ensuring the production is suitable for the target audience. An independent body, not burdened by the maximizing profit, would be more suitable for such a task. As an example, the bodies responsible for censoring viewing content came about because the guardians of consumers clamored for censorship. If the clamor had not occurred, a lot of unsuitable programs would have been aired with no qualms.
It is a known fact that there is a great proliferation of entertainment options. There are so many forms of entertainment targeted towards children for different purposes such as educational, informative, or pure entertainment purposes. For this reason, a lot of parents find it hard to censor what their wards view and are thus in a dilemma over making choices for program view. Despite this fact, parents should be responsible, and not necessarily the media, for ensuring that the children view appropriate content.
Firstly, parents are responsible for their children. The choices the children make are largely influenced by the parent’s views. As such, parents are in a solid position to ensure that at each time their children make a choice, those choices would be approved by the parent. The parent can thus note which entertainment content would be suitable for the child and which would not, thus shielding against wrong influences.
Secondly, the media industry is known as a for-profit organization, and its focus will be more on maximizing share-holders’ profits than on ensuring the suitability of programs being produced. For this reason, the media cannot be made fully responsible for ensuring standards as a lot of energy would be focused more on promoting the production than on ensuring the production is suitable for the target audience. An independent body, not burdened by the maximizing profit, would be more suitable for such a task. As an example, the bodies responsible for censoring viewing content came about because the guardians of consumers clamored for censorship. If the clamor had not occurred, a lot of unsuitable programs would have been aired with no qualms.
No comments:
Post a Comment